Talk:Grand Korean Waterway

Redirect request
can someone create a re-direct from "Pan Korea Grand Waterway" to this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.76.15.212 (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Pan Korea Grand Waterway doesn't seem to be a page. Do you mean to make it a page and then make the redirect?  If you search for it, you would end up here anyway, I'm sure.  Are you sure it is needed?  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. --Kusunose 05:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Bias
We have to remove the opinion pieces or find citations for them. Maybe try to quote Korean Herald article interviews or something, either way the article is biased against lee and the canal project. Da Baron (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree; in the meantime, I've added several tags throughout the article in places where the statements are seemingly most opinionated or biased. Swikid (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Grammar
The article needs more work, i'm no expert i just tried to make it sound correct. i think this article was drafted by a contributor w/ english a a 2nd language. Da Baron (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree; I've done what I could for now to clean up the grammar, spelling and general use of language throughout the article, especially in places where it most obviously needed some attention. Swikid (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Pictures of the waterway.
It would seem only fitting for someone to post a picture of the grand canal. I would, but I can't figure out how to upload pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toesti (talk • contribs) 13:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Left hand side of the screen. Toolbox. Upload Pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinyulim (talk • contribs) 20:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The canal doesn't exist, there are no photos, other than an artist's conception perhaps. It's still in the planning stages - and hopefully will stay that way. --Bentonia School (talk) 07:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Update needed
The section about the project in Lee Myung-bak's article is more up-to-date than this article, but still contains some speculation. So, this article should at least reflect the same state of information. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)