Talk:Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad

Requested move 20 September 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objection (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad → Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad – I think the Grand Muftiship is the better title than Muftiship. Because Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad is now Grand Mufti of India. Kutyava (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal of referenced edit
I have edited this page according to citation from a doctorate thesis. Available citations are mostly from recent news. But my edit removed by. Same user issued on me the charge of vandalism and disruptive editing. The removal has been reverted. Irshadpp (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Stop vandalism against Grand Mufti of India and related articles. The Grand Mufti of India was established during the Mughal era not by the Barelvi movement. The Barelvi movement was established by Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi. He was only born in 1800s. It had explained in Grand Mufti of India article with source. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁  (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 06:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Removal of a referenced edit will be considered as vandalism.--Irshadpp (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, Sure. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁  (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 19:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Deleting the timeline section
The Timeline section resembles a desk diary. Wikipedia policy (WP:DIARY) is against this kind of thing. Is there any reason not to delete the Timeline section? Toddy1 (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Better to remove, all receptions operated by organisations connected to subject. No value for that, even it is reported in routine news papers.--Irshadpp (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)