Talk:Grand Prix motorcycle racing/Archive 1

Google results
I don't have a suggestion, but I wanted to point out that when searching "motogp" in Google, this wikipedia article is number 43 in the list of results. I understand all the logical reasons to call this article "Grand Prix motorcycle racing", but for practical purposes the article is invisible to anyone looking for MotoGP information using Google.--Uli Kunkel 19:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's up to 8th place now. Not sure what changed (maybe Google?), but it's pretty acceptable.--Uli Kunkel 21:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Flag-to-flag racing
This system is detailed twice.
 * I deleted the repetition in the "Specifications" section, since that area seemed to focus more on the machines than on race rules.--207.62.67.122 18:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Top Speeds
From the article - " Current top speeds are approaching 350 km/h, which exceeds that of Formula One car racing."

Folks, it makes only sense to compare speeds a the same track only! Sometimes, the F1 and MotoGP of a country are held on different track, e.g. in Germany. Regarding top speeds, Circuit Catalunya might be a good indicator. --Matthead 18:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

What is the source for this, at the 2004 Italian F1 Grand Prix the top speed recorded in the speed traps was Pizzonia with 369KM/H. --202.1.119.192 16:24, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Good point. I didn't stop to check the accuracy of the statement when I was cleaning up the wording. I found a reference to Loris Capirossi setting a MotoGP speed record in 2003 at Mugello, 332.4 km/h (206.5 mph). Oddly enough, I couldn't find any reference to this at the MotoGP site, but of course it appears at the Ducati site, as well as numerous motorcycle racing news sites. I also found an Allianz press release about Antonio Pizzonia of the BMW WilliamsF1 team reaching 369.9 km/h (229.8 mph) in 2004 at Monza.


 * I'll adjust that part of the article to compare the current top speeds. Please correct the records if and when they are broken. :) --DrunkenMonkey 23:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Im not sure if 269km/h is the fastest F1 speed in history, i was just pointing out an emample of F1 having higher top speeds. That said i reckon MotoGP probobly had faster top speeds than F1 at the Shanghai circuit, as MotoGP cars do not have the drag that F1 cars get due to their massive downfoce. The reason F1 is so fast at Monza is that F1 cars run a low downforce setup there to maximise top speed. F1 cars would of course be massivly faster around the corners at Shanghai compared to Motogp. --202.1.119.192 15:00, 2 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The Allianz article states that "Pizzonia beat the former record set by world champion Michael Schumacher in the Italian Grand Prix 2003." I was unable to locate speed records at the F1 site. Downforce tuning is certainly important, but the long straights at Monza may have more influence on allowing the machines to reach higher speeds. World Superbike ace Troy Corser wrote, "I knew Monza was going to be tough, virtually anyone can go fast there. It is all about horsepower at this circuit and as a rider all you have to do is basically sit on the bike an [sic] turn the throttle!" Mugello, where Capirossi set the current MotoGP speed record, also has a long straight, more than a kilometer in length. --DrunkenMonkey 02:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)


 * That is probably based on the fact that during the 2004 IRTA test Capirossi recorded 347.4 km/h (with strong wind assistance). In the same year, at the same track (MGP doesn't race at Monza, the fastest F1 circuit) F1s were a fraction slower. So the statement is true, but a bit misleading. 213.28.235.4 06:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Only speeds measured in races count as official records. Also, if there is going to be any comparison with F1, talking of top speeds is only part of the story. If you compare lap times on the same circuits, the F1 lap times are sometimes more than 25% faster than the MotoGP times. Compare Malaysia, Suzuka, Catalunya, etc.

Fastest laps from the 2005 races at two tracks that MotoGP and F1 share: Malaysia: 1'35.483 Raikkonen 2'02.993 Hayden Catalunya: 1'15.641 Fisichella 1'43.195 Rossi Top speeds might be comparable, but in braking and cornering downforce+fat tires gives the cars a huge advantage.

Redirect
Ummm - superbikes? dirt rallies? etc? Motorcycle racing != Grand Prix

Agreed. I didn't do the redirection. --Robert Merkel

MotoGP
Maveric, the p in "Grand Prix" is always capitalized. Perhaps this should be titled "Grand Prix motorcycle racing" (or "MotoGP", the title the organisers use). --Robert Merkel


 * Not MotoGP, that is the new name for the fastest class of Grand Prix motorcycle racing (which I think is the appropriate name). The official name appears to be Road Racing Grand Prix, but that is not a good name for the article, since it excludes the motorcycle part. jheijmans

Have to disagree with you here Robert -- "grand prix" in this context has slipped into general usage. I always Goggle a term before determining the correct capitalization of articles. Check this out. If the number one linked and page ranked site on Google along with several others on the same first search result page uses the term in lowercase, then I think we can't claim that the the 'p' is always capitalized. The corresponding wikipedia naming convention to follow here is to use lowercase if the term is not always capitalized in English. BTW, I don't go out of my way to find lowercased examples of terms since improper usage is easy to find on even Google after the first two or three pages of search results. There should be an article about the race itself, but I'm not sure what to call it either. Capitalization of that "Grand Prix" may be warrented, but only a proper search and determine this (of course if you use the official and proper name of the race itself then it should be capitalized). Cheers! --maveric149

Maveric, on the google search you link, I don't see a lowercase p in the first hit. But, I think Grand Prix definitely should be in caps, no matter the usual policy. You may also find "Olympic games" (with lowercase g), but the page here isn't named like that. Both words are names and should be capitalised. jheijmans

The issue here is proper names - everything in wikipedia has a name but everything is wikipedia is not capitalized. If Grand Prix is a particular brand of motorcycle or if it is a very specific term that in other contexts is always capitalized (which when by itself it almost always is) and that term applies to a very specific class of bikes then capitalization may be warrented. With that said, this particular case really isn't that important because redirects now exists to cover several different capitalization and pluralization variants. Capitalization wasn't he major issue with the old name of the article BTW -- it was pluralization. How about a compromise of Grand Prix motorcycle? I wouldn't object to that due to the fact that Grand Prix (when expressed as a single term) is supposed to be capitalized. --maveric149

Grand Prix is not a type of motorcycle, but a type of contest in sports. You may also find it in automobile racing, but also in other sports the term is used. The (originally French) term is considered a proper name, yes. I see that the issue was about change the plural to singular, but Robert Merkel's proposal was to change the article's name to what it is about: the racing rather than the kind of motorcycles used. jheijmans


 * Interesting. How about Grand Prix motorcycle racing or if the capitalization of the "P" really isn't needed or is a general word (capitalization of the roots of anglicized terms isn't really valid -- otherwise all anglicized German nouns would be capitalized) then grand prix motorcycle racing (which is lowercased enough to technically rationalize this -- although there are several common capitalization variants besides these two. But I would recommend only the ones above). --maveric149


 * Maveric, I bit the bullet and shifted to Grand Prix motorcycle racing, seeing most people were happy with that. --Robert Merkel

Hey guys I'm super interested in MotoGP and will do my best to add and format content on MotoGP related pages. So far my small edits have been to add short but important details about recent season changes to the pages. --Nutschig 08:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

here is my opinion on the following sentence "this shift to 800 cc four-stroke engines also created a controversy as the 1000 cc Superbike racing circuit will extremely likely be the fastest motorcycle racing circuit in the world now"

At the current time, here is the situation : Superbikes are not as fast as the motocycles in the motoGP category and that can be seen by comparing all time reports for the circuits (Brno, phillip Island, Valencia, Losail, Assen) The difference in performance is significant and that's simply because motoGP bikes are full-fledged prototypes, and superbikes are not. Even with the shift to 800 cc, motoGP bikes will likely lose speed but that will be 1 second-2 seconds per lap according to the circuits, and therefore if we try to compare, Superbikes will not be able to out-perform them.

800cc
I'd like to see links or citations to the claims made in this paragraph: "The specific choice of a reduction to 800 cc (as opposed to other power reduction methods, such as decreasing the number of transmission gears permitted) is very favourable to Honda, who currently run a five cylinder machine, and need only remove a cylinder to modify their engine. Other manufacturers will need to entirely redesign their engines. Cynical journalists have suggested that this power reduction decision came about due to pressure from Honda, but there is no public evidence to support this claim."

I'm not an engineer, but I find it hard to imagine that the switch to 800cc will be as simple as removing a cylinder; also, the last sentence is a bit like asking "When did you stop beating your wife?" The whole paragraph smacks of Hondaphobia. --Uli Kunkel 05:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey there Uli, I was the one who threw in that paragraph at the last second, I'll add this link to the main page: http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=207419&FS= . "With the 2007 MotoGP regulations reducing maximum engine capacity from 990 to 800 cc, the balance of power in MotoGP may shift in favor of Honda, which is rumored to be able to develop a new engine by simply lopping off one of the current powerplant's five cylinders."


 * I work as a computer engineer with my university's Society of Automotive Engineer's Formula 3 car: from a mechanical engineering point of view, lopping off a fifth cylinder is a very easy way to design an engine. The valves, timing, and shapes of the cylinders don't have to have any change, as well as the volume of the cylinders. All other teams must completely redesign their engines, from the size and shape of their pistons to their valves and timing. --Nutschig 01:50, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I am a mechanical engineer. This statement is actually fairly incorrect for many reasons, I would guess that the journalist who made that claim has no familiarity with internal combustion engine design whatsoever. If no one objects, I would like to remove this paragraph. If anyone is interested, I will gladly provide all the reasons why removing a cylinder from the engine configuration would not be an effective method of complying with the new rules.Doctorscholz 22:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, edit finished, and I combined the two different sections on the 800cc rule change under the Specifications header. Any ideas? --Nutschig 02:04, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Nutschig: my compliments on the neatness of the changes; however, the source article has no author and refers to a "rumor". Also, lopping off a cylinder would result in 8ccs less than the limit, an insignificant difference in a cake recipe, but probably unacceptable in a sport that depends on hundreths of a second. I've also seen rumors that Honda's 800cc bike will be a V3, not a V4.


 * I think the intro page is getting too heavy with techincal minutae; it would probably frustrate any new fans of the sport.--Uli Kunkel 03:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I made some changes to try to make the intro and overview sections more readable.--Uli Kunkel 04:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me, guess we'll have to put some of the 990cc to 500 cc differences in some section about the history of MotoGP. I'll think about it. --Nutschig 05:01, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks; speaking of history, I'm working on a pretty extensive account of the Golden Era of GP: 1988 to 1993, season-by-season. It should be up by February.
 * Now that I've put the material together, it strikes me as inappropriate for an encylopedia-type site. Compliments to the guys that created the pages to the list Riders and Champions.Uli Kunkel 22:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Honda has unveiled their 800, and the capacity is 800cc, not the 792cc you'd expect if they simply lopped off a cylinder. The referenced article at motorsport.com is an anonymous rumor, and if Doctorsholz would be so kind, I *would* like to see a detailed description as to why going to 800 isn't as easy as lopping off a cylinder. In the meantime, the paragraph goes.Uli Kunkel 18:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Crank balance, timing, fuel management, transmission alteration for a different powerband, new clutchwork for computer-controlled traction control programs, new electronic throttle programs, new launch programs (if applicable to the race team), new aerodynamics with bodywork to compensate for a weaker engine, modified coolant system, modified lubricant delivery, new overall center-of-mass weight balance for the whole machine, new exhaust system...I could keep going--and all I did was remove one cylinder.209.114.201.30 20:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Specifications
I have rearranged the Specifications spection, and added some more detail. I have also created a 'Challenges for the Designer' section, which includes some interesting details and commentary not directly related to Spec's - Rgds, --Trident13 22:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Low/highside
Why is any of this text...
 * Motorcycle crashes are usually of two types: lowsides and highsides. A lowside is when the motorcycle falls onto the side closest to the ground mostly caused by the the front tyre losing grip, usually from cornering too sharply or using too much front brake; a highside is when a motorcycle flips in the opposite direction of the turn. Highsides occur from the back tyre losing grip, starting to spin and slide and finally achieving grip which, in most cases, propels the rider from the seat.

...important to this article? I suggest we remove it. Might even make sense to start an article called something like "motorcycle crashes" and explain different kinds of crashes. Thoughts? Roguegeek 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I inserted that text because I'd like the MotoGP article to be useful to people who are new to motorcycle racing, instead of assuming everyone has been watching for a while.--Uli Kunkel 18:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Makes sense to me. It feels like it could be another article entirely, though. It's not like the Grand Prix article talks about what a motorcycle is. It assumes you know and if you want more knowledge on what a motorcycle is, they'll click on the wikilink to motorcycle. I still like the idea of making it a separate article all together. Thoughts? Roguegeek (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, you convinced me, especially since crashes apply to more than one type of road motorcycle racing. Not that I'm going to be the one to write the moto crash article, though.--Uli Kunkel 02:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Brianhe made a pair of nice separate articles for lowsides and highsides, and since I added the original text, I guess I'll go ahead and remove it to streamline the article.Uli Kunkel 21:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

World Championship Grand Prix motorcycle racing
There were Grand Prix before there was a World Championship Grand Prix, and they are not even mentioned, so, is the page title appropriate?Seasalt 12:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

MotoGP class
The following text is premature:
 * The hope that this reduced engine size would reduce MotoGP speed was proved without merit during initial tests of the 800 cc machines at Valencia in late 2006, when the new machines lapped within a fraction of a second of the speeds attained during the last 990 cc MotoGP two weeks earlier.

Testing lap times are close for the 800s and 990s, but there haven't yet been any real top speeds posted. If the 800s are substantially slower in the straights but faster in the turns, that would make them safer because lack of run-off space at the end of a straight is what killed Katoh and had maximum speeds been allowed to continue creeping up, expensive track redesigns would have been necessary. The move to 800cc could buy track managers a few more years before having to make the changes.--Uli Kunkel 19:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

While Valencia does have a medium length front straight, the circuit itself is not particularly "open". Top speed will surely be affected by the displacement loss, despite the fact that engine revolution speed may increase. During the season opener at Losail, the bikes did seem "slower" on the long front straight. Besides, smaller displacement bikes typically make up for time lost in the straights by having higher cornering speeds because more acceleration while in-corner is attainable because of reduced horsepower, thus reducing the tendancy for the bike to kick out under acceleration while leaned over. We will see for sure when they race at Assen, but for now, with the only races run being Losail and Jerez, no definitive comments can be made to the loss in top speed until an official report is made.

Besides, Capirossi set his record at Mugello, so it stands to reason we will see some definitive numbers there. They come out of the final turn fast and have more than a kilometer to accelerate down the straight.

"Mototcycling has been the most dangherous sportyw rold wids," someone care to explain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capo975 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Off course
Two things. First, does anybody have a list of venues they could include? I'd be interested, & I'm sure others would be, too. Second, can somebody clarify something I've heard? Namely, the last 500cc event was at the Piquet circuit in '01. The article doesn't support that... Trekphiler 11:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Orsoni has added a bunch of pages for season reviews (see bottom of the main page), but there's a gap from '99 to '04; the season review pages have a list of rounds/tracks. Your second question can be answered by going to motogp.com and looking at the results for 2001 (yes, it was at Piquet); I think the main GP wikipedia page would be too cumbersome if it had to include such specific information.--Uli Kunkel 23:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2001 season review page added.--Uli Kunkel 16:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Riders
Isn't the riders section a bit limited and a bit too much on the US side? Agostini and Dooham are not such bad riders.. You can check the "champions" link.

There is nowhere the process and links for joining MotoGP and being a biker.Is there any way out for a normal to reach that place? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.160.4 (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Superbike
A quick note about superbike?

Fair use rationale for Image:Motogp.jpg
Image:Motogp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

"Challenges for the Designer" para 1
Like Formula One cars, grand prix motorcycles are made not only to be raced but to demonstrate the technical and design prowess of the manufacturer.

This statement makes it sound as though the technology is an end in itself &mdash; as though Grand Prix motorcycles have features that are merely there to demostrate the manufacturer's technical ability, and not to help them win races. Surely, that can't be true. I propose changing the first paragraph to:

Like Formula One cars, grand prix motorcycles are generally made of lightweight and expensive materials such as titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic. They regularly feature technology not available to the general public, and part of their fan-appeal derives from this sophisticated technology and the high degree of technical skill demostrated by the designers and manufacturers.

--Tedd 21:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

New Infobox
I returned Nicky Hayden as MotoGP champion and added a note about Stoner. Technically Hayden remains the champion until the end of the season when FIM formally announces the new champions. Plus I don't think its right to have the 2007 MotoGP champion along with the 2006 125cc and 250cc champions. Chris Ssk 12:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

New infobox more suitable for MotoGP added Jcer80 00:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I changed the infobox so that each class has its own section. Chris Ssk  talk 03:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Results
Would it be worth keeping a record of results, similar to the way there is one for Formula One? (,, , , ...)? It just seems like natural progression of the article that there should be access to a results table. --Cpl Syx (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Isn't this similar to F1 (2008, 2007 ...) results? Or did I misunderstand the question?  ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah I was unaware that one already existed (strangely I couldn't find it previously, obviously I was doing something wrong!). In that case, should it not be linked to from the main page? --Cpl Syx (talk) 03:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It is, there is a table at the bottom of the article, same as F1 Chris Ssk  talk 15:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow. Sorry, I must be completely blind. :S --Cpl Syx (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Prototypes vs. replicas
I removed the text "The only recent exception being the Ducati Desmosedici, which is a true road replica of a MotoGP racing bike, made available in small numbers by Ducati in 2006" because: Ducati marketing copy shouldn't be taken too literally. --Rubber Nipple Salesman (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Technical rule 2.2 states "Four stroke motorcycles participating in the MotoGP class must be prototypes." In other words, if there was anything truly like it on the road, it would render the race bike illegal.
 * A repli-racer of a 2006 GP bike is certainly not a "true" replica of current 800cc motorcycles that have no road-going equivalents.


 * I read an in-depth article about the Desmosedici RR in Cycle World back in December, and from what I recall the bike was pretty damn close to the 990cc GP version, excluding obvious things like turn signals, lights, mirrors, etc. I'm sure if the line was changed to "...road replica of a 990cc MotoGP racing bike..." it would work fine.  ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ (talk) 06:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with removing that line. and I don't see the reason to mention a race replica bike, especially in the lead section of the article Chris Ssk  talk 17:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Lighter class top speeds?
Hi I wonder what's the top speed of a 125cc?

1Chaan (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know the absolute top speed but Stefan Bradl had the top speed at Qatar with 240km/h, top speed in qualy this morning was 220km/h again by Bradl. Chris Ssk  talk 13:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)