Talk:Grantsburg, Wisconsin

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Grantsburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov/ to http://factfinder2.census.gov/
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fgeo%2Fwww%2Fgazetteer%2Ffiles%2FGaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
 * Added tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Longitude
The longitude given in Geography is not the same as in the infobox. The difference isn't huge ... but why is there a difference at all? Geography has 92°41′4″W, and gives the decimal form as -92.684718 - but the decimal form works out to be 92°41′4.9848″W; i.e. it should be 92°41′5″W. The infobox has 92°44′2″W - a difference of just under 3′, which equates to about 3¾ km west, well outside Grantsburg's boundary. The longitude in Geography is very close to the centre of Grantsburg - so it should be used in the infobox. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Demographics
2010 census - 1,341 people, 567 households, and 345 families; and the average household size was 2.28 and the average family size was 2.92. Average household size = number of people (1341) divided by the number of households (567) — but this gives 2.365, not 2.28. Average family size = number of people (1341) divided by the number of families (345) — but this gives 3.886, not 2.92.

2000 census - 1,369 people, 565 households, and 332 families; and the average household size was 2.32 and the average family size was 2.98. Average household size = number of people (1369) divided by the number of households (565) — but this gives 2.423, not 2.32. Average family size = number of people (1369) divided by the number of families (332) — but this gives 4.123, not 2.98.

So how are these calculated? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)