Talk:Graphic designer/Archive 1

Requested move
Graphic designers → Graphic designer – to be consistent with Wikipedia style we try to avoid un-needed plural in the article title. and also it is to be consistent with other occupation articles. Thank you in advance for your consideration Goldenrowley 04:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Survey
''Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, per nom. - Cyrus XIII 09:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support per nom - Ronline ✉ 08:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Prodded?
I removed the prod. If you look there are about 50 graphic design biography articles linked to it, all looking for an article explaining the specific job title, qualifications, job duties. I dont think the fact there is an article on graphic design or a list of graphic designers is relevant replacement for a a job description article. There is an category for job occupation articles, like artist, engineer, typesetter independent of the field articles art, engineering and typesetting. Goldenrowley 05:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Infobox appears as totally inappropriate
Is this an arricle about Graphic design? I do not see how a person infobox is appropriate!! Thia ahould be about what Graphic designers are, what they do, and so on. It appears that it is really about two guys and their accomplishment with that box. Not the topic as a whole-- or what graphic designers do. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mac Operator for deletion
The article Mac Operator is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mac Operator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Gazmend — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.114.94.6 (talk) 17:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)