Talk:Gravitational force

Guys, please don't keep redirecting the article to "Gravitation" and if you don't like what it contains then just place AfD on it so then hopefully some grownups join the discussion and instruct you about Wikipedia NPOV policy if you don't believe me. Jim 07:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Dear Jim, there is no reason to spend the time of the Wiki community on AfDs to deal with this. There is no reason in the world that people who want to read about "gravitational force" will read your rant instead of the article Newton's law of universal gravitation. If you really believe it's a useful thing to do to split the articles, please discuss it first on the Talk pages of the original article (especially now, that you know that there is a very strong objection to your changes from at least two Wikipedians). Yevgeny Kats 13:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree w/Yevgeny. linas 17:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Dear Yevgeny, If you like Newton better than Einstein it's too bad but Wikipedia is also for high school students who like to know how gravitation looks today and not necessarily how it looked 300 years ago. Even if there is a lot of people like you, e.g. linas who supports you already, there are also some who would like to learn something more then Newtonian physics. So please revert to my old version and place AfD on it if you want it to be deleted for some reason. And state the reason too (e.g. "Einstein bad, Newton good"). There are certain rules for Wikipedia editors to be followed so please follow them. Jim 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)