Talk:Gravitoelectromagnetism/to do

tasks for expert:
 * rewrite more along lines of most recent Mashhroon review article,
 * more NPOV,
 * be careful to explain that GEM is not the same thing at all as "gravity shielding" or EM fields allegedly producing antigravity; politely stress that GEM is mainstream but these two topics tend toward crackpottery,
 * write and link to background articles on "warp drives"; clarify relations to GEM alleged in current version,
 * maybe a small caveat about mainstream modes of partial interconversion between gravitational and EM fields; explain why these are not useful for "gravity shielding" or "exotic spacecraft propulsion" schemes!
 * title should really be gravitoelectromagnetism - done r b-j 05:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * distinguish carefully between weak-field, slowly moving test particle, and other assumptions,
 * explain relatation with Bel decomposition (valid generally) and mention strong-field cosmological GEM type extension of Dunbar et al.
 * distinguish between gtr and other theories