Talk:Great Eastern Highway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Will copyedit as I go (please revert any inadvertent changes to meaning), and jot notes below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 *  the highway is a central shopping precinct, with two shopping centres located alongside the highway, and retail businesses fronting both sides of the road. - try to not use the word "highway" twice. Also describing a highway as a shpping precinct sounds funny to me
 * Adjusted wording - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * do we have any idea or source with the gradient of greenmount hill?
 * Added gradient and source as a footnote, as this is starting to get a bit technical - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 *  The road persists in its journey eastward - I wouldn't use "persist" here..."continues"?
 * Adjusted wording - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 *  ribbon cutting ceremony - hyphen needed here
 * Fixed - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 *  provides a limited access bypass of Guildford - ditto.
 * Fixed - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * any more on black spots or heavy traffic places?

Otherwise looking good and on track for GA status. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Most of the above has been fixed, I just have to do some research for that last one... will take a look over the next couple of days - Evad37 &#91;talk] 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added info on congestion and road safety, which may need to be copyedited. I've also come across some information on a bypass constructed at Clackline, which I'll add to the article tomorrow. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 12:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added the information, if you'd like to take another look - Evad37 &#91;talk] 05:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - nice read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)