Talk:Great Mosque of Gaza/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi. I am reviewing this article for GA. I have gone through the article and find it excellent. I added a few architectural wikilinks.
 * You have a quote in the lead, "beautiful", which theoretically should be referenced. But since you have the same quote referenced in the article, I think that rule can be skipped in this case. The article leaves room for expansion at a later date, but the basic ground work is done. A very good job! &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 01:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is an excellent little article. Passes GA. Congradulations! &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): The prose is excellent b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets historical context b (focused): Remains focused on the subject of the article
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: