Talk:Great Vancouver Fire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 16:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I can review this shortly. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Given that you haven't edited in several months,, I'll give one or two weeks for these issues to be resolved before putting the effort into a full review. If you intend to respond to comments as they come up, please let me know. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Book sources need page numbers
 * Per WP:LEDECITE, material that is cited in the article doesn't need to be cited in the lede


 * I appreciate you taking the time to review. I dont plan on adding page numbers to the book references as that would take a long time. Maybe one day someone will take on this task and the article could be promoted to GA status. Thank you for your time. Clemlivy aikensnaps (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Understandable, Thanks for all the work you've done-- the article is certainly a lot better even if page numbers are lacking. I am failing this nomination, however. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)