Talk:Greater Talent Network

Requested move 16 December 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure)  sami  talk 21:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Greater Talent Network (GTN) → Greater Talent Network – The initialism, which isn't part of the company's name, shouldn't be used as a disambiguator in the article title. The proposed target has been protected from creation due to repeated WP:SPAM violation. See also: If the article now meets our standards, it should be moved to the correct place. —Ketil Trout (&lt;&gt;&lt;!) 21:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943  (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting since the proposed move location, Greater Talent Network, currently has creation protection, and since the only participants in the discussion thus far (not including the nominator) are unregistered editors. So, relisting in the hope that additional editors will participate in this discussion to ensure (and hopefully enforce) that no consensus manipulation has occurred.
 * Requests for undeletion/Archive 102
 * Support - there seems little reason not to have the article at its correct title. It's a fairly crappy article with a miserable history of attempted spam by the company described but that is another argument. 79.65.126.84 (talk) 14:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support The GTN isn't needed as the title says it all ready without the initials needed 2602:304:28AB:9EE0:B404:E174:35E:75AD (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943  (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Strongly support. Don't worry, no consensus manipulation here; just trying to fix up this poorly-made stub article. Definitely agree per nom. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.