Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2002/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

I'll take this review. If you have time, please consider starting one of your own: the backlog at WP:GAN is long. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm just visiting this to give the polite suggestion a reviewer takes a good look at source adherence. Kingsif (talk) 03:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That is the basic duty of a GA reviewer, and I will additionally note that your article was nominated by a different editor than for this one. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation :
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * See below.
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * See below.

Random source spot-check

 * 2 fine
 * 3 fine
 * 10 AGF but based on basic Greek knowledge, probably fine
 * 17 fine
 * 25 fine
 * 28 not sure if it's necessary, but it's fine source-text-wise


 * Spot-check passed

Comments

 * "Ellinikós Telikós 2002 was the Greek national final developed by ERT" is somewhat unclear. "Final" as in final competition? Do you "develop" a final?
 * I have edited a couple of sentences for better grammar/punctuation/clarity.
 * "Ten songs competed" songs don't compete—perhaps performers or artists do?
 * Is the youtube citation really necessary?

Putting this on temporary hold; just a few comments to resolve. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I piped national final to National selections for the Eurovision Song Contest. I guess I hadn't realized that it was a jargony term. I changed the "songs" to "entries". I want to say performers, but since some songs were by groups that got weird. The Youtube link is more of a courtesy. I could just cite the existence of the event itself without a link, but since the Youtube video was posted by the broadcaster itself, I included it for additional verifiability; it serves as the only ref for some of the info. Grk1011 (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)