Talk:Greek Atomic Energy Commission

Bogus copyright infringement claim
Can you please say what within -- -- is copyright infringement? The statement that X is responsible for Y? That X is supervised by Z?NuclearEnergy (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. The amount of creativity required for copyright protection is minimal. Presenting the same facts in the same order is sufficient to qualify as a a copyright violation.


 * While the facts themselves are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten from scratch in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". VernoWhitney (talk) 15:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)