Talk:Green Revolution and cancer

this page is terrible. should this really exist?

Petitepassionz (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you please point to specific reasons why this page is terrible? Docku (talk) 21:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, The main article Green revolution deals with green revolution in general like what it is, where it started, how it spread, how it helped humanity, advantages and disadvantages of the same. I created this new article to provide emphasis on the newly emerging but disturbing trend of the negative side effects of green revolution. By the way, Why dont you help improve the article instead of nominating it for deletion. Docku (talk) 22:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The reason your article should be deleted is because the topic is not worthy of its own entry. This stuff should be in the main green revolution page.  If it was worthy of it's own entry, then a bunch of other green revolution pages need to be made, such as "the green revolution and famine," and the "green revolution and diabetes," etc.  I agree that the topic is interesting and should be in the main green revolution page, but it definitely is worthy to have its own article.  So please, let's delete this page already.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petitepassionz (talk • contribs) 02:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

NPOV
This article is very biased. Statements like:

"However, the shortcomings of the green revolution started to become evident as it was becoming increasingly clear that the chemicals and pesticides make their way into the humans through consumption of food produced using these chemicals."

Are misleading and not facts (as they're presented here.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.65.22.14 (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)