Talk:Greens Equo

Contested edits
This info has been reverted due to it being either unsourced or poorly sourced. Note that adding random sources does not account for sourcing, as sources must meet the WP:VERIFY guideline. This means that there is an issue when the newly-added sources are both poorly cited and do not justify the added ideologies (note that reaching conclusions not explicitly stated in the sources is synthesis. For example, pro-Europeanism was cited on the grounds of a statement by promoters on 2011 that the party had "an Europeanist and Mediterranean vocation" (which is not the same as having a pro-Europeanism ideology)). For other ideologies, a book was cited which did not constitute an actual source (because it did not attribute these as Equo's ideologies) neither would it have constituted a valid source for these, as the referenced material merely laid out the political vision of one of Equo's MEPs, Florent Marcellesi (thus constituting a primary source). Other sources were extracts from Marcellesi's personal online blog (some of which dated from 2007, way earlier than Equo's foundation. Not saying that online blogs do usually constitute questionable sources as well). As per this, I commend you to engage in talk instead of keeping the edit warring ongoing, as it is obvious that your edits are contested.  Impru20 talk 20:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)