Talk:Greg Ball (politician)/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

There are clear-cut issues here with NPOV, advertisement, and detail (violating the article breadth criterion). 141.155.57.27 (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

This is a political advertisement wherein "controversial" issues are raised, then dispensed with. There do not seem to be factual errors so much as biased political coverage. H2O32F 23:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFrieze (talk • contribs)

The artical is well written but bothers me. I do not think it should be given GA status.

It smells of politics and that is something we do not want to be involved with on Wikipedia.Steven1969 (talk) 02:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The article has several shortcomings. It fails MoS standards with stubby paragraphs and a lead which fails to provide a complete encapsulation of the article. There are also POV concerns and some missing ref tags. It will benefit from a Good Article review; I suspect it should be delisted. Majoreditor (talk) 04:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I am delisting this article in view of the concerns raised. Ucucha 19:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)