Talk:Greg Hunt

Do the Wikipedia comments really need their own section?
I know, we love it when a public figure talks about us, and want to mention it in his article. But concerns of WP:RECENTISM and WP:WEIGHT apply. It's not clear to me if this quote is of such importance to Hunt's career that it needs to be highlighted in the way it currently is. I guess we should wait and see if there's any longer lasting consequences first. But my feeling is that that these comments, if worth mentioning at all, perhaps should be mentioned just as one line in the 'political career' section rather than being given their own section. Robofish (talk) 02:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree; in all likelihood this would be, at most, one of many events in Hunt's political career. I think it's worth keeping the quote (it allows readers to assess Hunt's words directly), but it should probably be part of the "Political career" section. If it does have significant consequences it could maybe become a subsection later. Also I would propose the wording "about the relationship between climate change and bushfires" as clearer than just "about climate change issues" at the end of the sentence - any feedback on that? Dendrite1 (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Concur. Hunt was really just responding to a topical issue. There is an interesting discussion developing re climate change and the bushfires that can be found at Talk:2013 New South Wales bushfires. Rangasyd (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks like consensus to me. It's now more than eighteen months later, and nobody talks about the incident. Except us. If someone has a recent MSM example, please throw it up here. Please. --Pete (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Can thIs article be posted to the article on Hunt? Greg Hunt Caught Editing Wikipedia To Deny The Existence Of Cyclones — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pionade (talk • contribs) 05:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No. What rubbish. --Pete (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Greg Hunt
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Greg Hunt's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "green": From David Gillespie (politician):  From National Party of Australia:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)