Talk:Greg Kadel

Conflict of interest, notability and potential copyright violation issues?
This is one of several dozen articles created by this person’s agent. (It was not necessarily done with their knowledge.) It should be reviewed for notability, conflict of interest and neutral language. Some of the agent’s other articles had copyright issues as well. For more details, see: — A. B. (talk • contribs) 18:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist (permanent link)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greg Kadel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090423112537/http://www.gregkadelstudios.com/lib/bio.html to http://www.gregkadelstudios.com/lib/bio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Unproven allegations
I've removed the "Sexual harassment allegations" section from this article. The section is based on well-sourced reports of unproven allegations against Kadel. While the sources are valid, the allegations remain unproven (i.e. no charges have been file; no court decisions have been reached). Per WP:BLP, Wikipedia needs to take more care than many other media outlets in reporting such unproven allegations. Until the allegations are proven, I believe it is in keeping with Wikipedia policy to not report them. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my own edit having re-read WP:BLP. Reliably reported allegations, especially where the allegations have had significant impact on the subject's career, should be reported, as well as any reports of the subject's own denial of the allegations. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I'm not sure that Kadel is notable enough to justify an article, but if he is, then this material is certainly appropriate, since it represents the bulk of what he's notable for, based on a look at his news mentions. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)