Talk:Greg King (author)

inappropriate use of WP:BLP-PROD
It shouldn't take an editor with as little familiarity with Wikipedia policy as I have to recognize that this WP:BLP-PROD is a perversion of process.

But I shall assume good faith, and so my inference is that the editor who invoked BLP-PROD is aware of this fact, but feels that the best way to get a flawed policy fixed is to demonstrate the flaw by causing the flawed policy to be applied in a harmful way. Brilliant, eh? Fabrickator (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I thought my first PROD was a BLP PROD, not a regular PROD, so when the template was removed without addition of RS I added the BLP PROD (or, as I thought, re-added it). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ No nefarious subversion of the policy here. JoelleJay (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)