Talk:Greg Mail

Untitled
This is gushing praise for a batsman who has been an average performer at first class level. Follow the link to the Cricinfo blurb and read for yourself. His stats (61 matches, avge 32) don't match the glowing description, which sounds like it was written by his manager. Now that I've taken out the POV stuff, is there any reason for an article on Mail to exist? It's not like he's been considered for Australian selection or anything, and he hasn't been in the spotlight for anything else. Damanmundine1 11:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)