Talk:Gregg Jarrett

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Gregg Jarrett During Live Broadcast.jpg
 * Gregg Jarrett Journalist.jpg
 * Gregg Jarrett Television Anchor.jpg

Possible bias by omitting evidence validating Jarrett's claim
Is it possible that this article unnecessarily biases the reader by not including a sample of journalists confirming the accuracy of his reporting, as well as those disputing inaccuracies in his reporting. In particular, it might be useful to include material from "The Russia Hoax" that was confirmed by Inspector General Horowitz's report on the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign.

It's just my opinion, but this article seems to say less about Jarrett's actual thesis regarding what he terms "the Russia hoax" and more about how critics refute it. I am not suggesting that this article be a stand-in for the controversy over the Russian collusion investigation, but that there are journalists who confirm Jarrett's thesis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milkchaser (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Father's Rights Lawyers
Cordell and Cordell have been paid $30,000 in the last year and my son is bankrupt, losing his home,his job, his kids because the court commissioner gives spouse 29% of gross for child care,and $817. a month for maintenance. He made $27(?) an hour and she got a job making 14 an hour. How is this fair. 2600:1008:B152:8921:74E6:116E:2620:E6A (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)