Talk:Gregory Meeks

Problems with article
Mostly a string of unrelated "issues" with no context or sequence. Definitely needs some non-POV work. Flatterworld (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Article also needs a thorough copy-edit, it reads as if written by someone who is not fluent in English. L0b0t (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

The intro and basic information seem ok after earlier corrections; however, it does start to read much like a campaign ad and seems somewhat non-neutral.Editfromwithout (talk) 22:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I have NEVER read an entry so biased towards the subject of the article. Others have raised this years ago; what gives? Bostonbarney (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)