Talk:Grey column

Student peer reviews
Good time range of sources (15,334 bytes) More links would be helpful, some sentence structures could be improved for clarity but overall good " More citations in the Role in Pain System and Lateral Grey Column sections would be helpful. Could add more but sufficient linking and a red link Haptic" and "nociceptive" can be linked. "Analgesics" can also be linked. no comments so no need for response Formatting is a little confusing more of an intro about the three separate types may help to orient the reader. Pictures/diagrams would be extremely helpful Capitalize Laminae in the sentence "laminae III and IV....". The article switches between the European spelling "grey" and the American spelling "gray". Good article but not outstanding Total: 17/20
 * 1) Quality of the information: 2
 * 1) Article size: 2
 * 1) Readability: 1
 * 1) References: 2
 * 1) Links: 2
 * 1) Responsive to Comments: 2
 * 1) Formatting: 2
 * 1) Writing: 1
 * 1) Used Real Name: 2
 * 2) Is Outstanding in some way: 1

Jsiemer3 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback Jessica. I standardized the page to only use one spelling of "grey". I will also add those links you suggested. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Strong use of hyperlinks, but wording is sometimes confusing and article may not be understood completely by the average reader. Strong use of links to other Wikipedia articles throughout. No comments Good organization of sub-sections. Some awkward sentence structure, but overall the article is well written and consistent. Only slightly over 15,000 Bytes and only obvious portions of the topic are discussed. Also, there are no figures or pictures to increase understanding. Total: 18 out of 20
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2
 * 3) Readability: 1
 * 1) Refs: 2
 * 2) Links: 2
 * 1) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 1) Formatting: 2
 * 1) Writing: 2
 * 1) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 2) Outstanding?: 1

Ryandrsmith (talk) 15:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I will work on restructuring some of the sentences. Thanks for the feedback. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I added a picture as you suggested. Thanks. Bsridhar6 (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I have had no particular problem with readability. No comments so far Well-organized (anterior vs posterior vs lateral) Consistent and writing style A lot of information covered, but depth seems lacking a little bit Total: 19 out of 20
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2
 * 3) Readability: 2
 * 1) Refs: 2
 * 2) Links: 2
 * 3) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 1) Formatting: 2
 * 1) Writing: 2
 * 1) Used real name: 2
 * 2) Outstanding?: 1

JinYongSim (talk) 17:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback.Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

My name is Balaji Sridhar and I have spent the past months working on a new, detailed gray column page which has just been added. Bsridhar6 (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Section headers
Students: please note that the headers (titles) of each section are incorrectly capitalized, per MOS:CAPS. Please fix it. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback and link to the MOS, Tryptofish. I changed the sections headers to sentence case as listed in the link you provided. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Spinal cord horn
A small stub all of which covered in Grey column and in more detail Iztwoz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC) ✅

Proposed merge of Posterior grey column into Grey column
Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Anterior grey column into Grey column
Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)