Talk:Grey reef shark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

This is a wonderfully interesting article. I have no suggestions for improvement to offer. It is excellent. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC) GA review (see here for criteria)

Congratuations! Another great article.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Very well written; interesting and clearly presented b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Excellently referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources  c (OR): No OR apparent
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers all major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 20:57, 9 May 2009 (UTC)