Talk:Gridrunner Revolution

Proposed deletion - why ?
I'm finding it very hard to fathom why anyone would want to delete this article - it's far more comprehensive than some out there that are NOT marked for deletion. The article serves a very useful purpose by providing details on the game Gridrunner Revolution and I feel that it should remain.--Gaunt (talk) 08:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As mentioned in the Articles for deletion discussion, Durova's complaint was that there was no "independent demonstration of notability" as all sources were self-published or on Web forums. Independent sources have since been provided. Harlequin (talk) 10:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)