Talk:Griffith Rutherford/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) There is a disamb link to Partisan✅
 * 2) In the Campaign against the Cherokee section do you know what his regiment was called ?
 * 3) In the Battle of Ramsour's Mill section Johnson informed Rutherford of the change of plans by 10 o'clock - is that am or pm 10:00 ?✅
 * 4) Locke's forces left their encampment late in the evening of June 19 and arrived at the enemy's position enemy is POV can you change British or loyalist ?✅
 * 5) Same a bit further on though it was discovered that the enemy was regrouping✅
 * 6) There is a clarification tag in the Later life section✅
 * 7) Can the books in the bibliography have publishing location added✅

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. A good read well done --Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I unfortunately cannot find the name of Rutherford's regiment, though I do believe I'll be able to fix the unclear statement in "Later Life"-(Wikipedian1234 (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC))
 * Ok the regiment may cause a problem if it goes A or FA class but can live with it here. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Every issue has been attended to apart from the name of Rutherford's Regiment.-(Wikipedian1234 (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC))


 * Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)