Talk:Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego

Malone and Covid-19
I think that it is perfectly reasonable to include a short paragraph about the discussion around Mass Formation Psychosis especially considering the widespread publicity it has received. My attempts to include it have been rejected but mostly on technicalities and I don't want to appear to be edit warring so is that something other editors would want to include. A quick google search will show tons of articles related to this but I hadn't realized Forbes is considered unreliable.RichmanHopson (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Failure to comply with Wikipedia's core policies isn't a 'technicality', and in any case we shouldn't be mentioning in the article on this book that somebody misused a term it happens to also use on a podcast a few weeks ago (WP:RECENTISM). MrOllie (talk) 13:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

"Mass formation" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mass formation and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 31 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 18:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)