Talk:Guarantees of non-repetition

Meets the criteria for a kick-off article ?
I'm at the origin of this article. I thought the way I wrote the article was a good way to kick-start the article? Seems like relevant to have it in the wikipedia? I assume others will pick-up and complement it? Aren't we supposed to be bold and stuff like that? Lately, whenever I tried to add something like an article, start one in my own page, I've had many of my additions and complete articles being deleted and even put on a blacklist for copy/pasting original articles even though they I summarized and rewrote them, added a lot of links to other articles, added references, etc. I don't know where all this is going but I find the English wikipedia arbiters far too severe, respectless, un-helpfull. I speak other languages and also write on other wikipedia's. I've read a lot on copy rights, how to start an article, in the help pages on the wikipedia. If this isn't good, then I need a more help. Thy --SvenAERTS (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)