Talk:Guillaume Darcourt

Notability
Jadeslair, How is this article pass notability guidelines? It should have been cleaned up prior to acceptance in AfC. Delta13C (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well the subject clearly seems notable to me. I did not see a reason to reject it based on that. I also did searches to confirm. I agree the article should be cleaned up but I do not believe that is a reason to decline it. If I am wrong please let me know and show me the guideline. Jadeslair (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There is no poker guideline, just an unapproved essay. This means that WP:BIO applies, and I don't see enough sources cited to pass this bar. I did a search and also did not find anything beyond mentions on poker websites. Delta13C (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ok, I will take responsibility for it and try to cite notability items. If not then I will ask you how we should proceed as I do not know how to unapprove an article besides deletion. although I will research it Jadeslair (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * That is it, there are many articles but they say mostly the same things. I don't see a need to add one hundred similar citations. How would you like to proceed?Jadeslair (talk) 17:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)