Talk:Gump Roast/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GRAPPLE   X  02:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * That's too bad, the thirteenth season is usually considered a turn to form for the series.Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * I made some changes, have a look! Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Added an image from the episode.Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'm going to place this nomination on hold considering the comments made above. I'd consider both the points to be contributing to this, and if either the lack of a good lead image or the article's prose style is fixed, I would consider that enough to pass it. Both would be preferable, however; but I'd rather not pass the article without at least one being addressed.|I'm going to place this nomination on hold considering the comments made above. I'd consider both the points to be contributing to this, and if either the lack of a good lead image or the article's prose style is fixed, I would consider that enough to pass it. Both would be preferable, however; but I'd rather not pass the article without at least one being addressed.
 * I'm satisfied with the changes, and have passed the article.|}}
 * Thanks!Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Added an image from the episode.Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'm going to place this nomination on hold considering the comments made above. I'd consider both the points to be contributing to this, and if either the lack of a good lead image or the article's prose style is fixed, I would consider that enough to pass it. Both would be preferable, however; but I'd rather not pass the article without at least one being addressed.|I'm going to place this nomination on hold considering the comments made above. I'd consider both the points to be contributing to this, and if either the lack of a good lead image or the article's prose style is fixed, I would consider that enough to pass it. Both would be preferable, however; but I'd rather not pass the article without at least one being addressed.
 * I'm satisfied with the changes, and have passed the article.|}}
 * Thanks!Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm satisfied with the changes, and have passed the article.|}}
 * Thanks!Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)