Talk:Guy Abeille

Replace the entry
Request edit

I'm Guy Abeille and someone recently posted an entry "Guy Abeille" about me :  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Abeille

They are a lot of mistakes in it, and a part of fiction...

I wish the entry to be removed, or at least replaced by the translation of the french entry, which is sufficient and correct (I'm not the author) :  http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Abeille

Thank's for what you will be able to do ; the entry can't stay as it is.

Guy Abeille — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuyAbeille (talk • contribs) 16:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. It would be helpful if you could specify exactly what you believe these "mistakes" and "fiction" are. We need to know what precise changes to the article you are seeking, along with details of the reliable sources that back up your proposed revisions. Edwardx (talk) 19:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Christian Trinity
Several newspaper articles explain that the 3% rule came from the Trinity. This referenced info has been redacted several times by User:FreeRangeFrog, calling it "ridiculous." It is not our job to pass judgements on referenced info. This should not be redacted.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC) or stop trying to assert that this has some kind of Christian religious significance. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You can either quote this fully and correctly: "les trois Grâces, la Trinité, les trois jours de la résurrection, les trois ordres alchimiques, la triade hégélienne, les trois âges d’Auguste Comte, les trois couleurs fondamentales, l’accord parfait... la liste est infinie..."
 * Second reference: "C’est un bon chiffre, un chiffre qui a traversé les époques, cela faisait penser à la Trinité.", making the Christian origin very clear.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Another reference, with the same quote, making it very clear that it comes from the Trinity: "C'est un bon chiffre, un chiffre qui a traversé les époques, cela faisait penser à la Trinité. »".Zigzig20s (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Look, you're not going to turn this into some kind of religious statement. Take it to WP:DRN if you wish, or just leave it alone. The assertion that I am "censoring religion" is truly bizarre and it just shows you're trying to make a point rather than improve the article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The term "Trinity" in the references in self-explanatory.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not the way you insist on using it. Please be specific, why did you not use instead? § FreeRangeFrog  croak 20:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Because the term used in most references (see above) is Trinity. The Wikipedia article is very clear about what the Trinity is. Anyway, I've made my point; this is getting tedious. I'm done.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Close connection or original research
User:FreeRangeFrog appears to be engaged in original research or have a close connection to the subject. This edit suggests they are editing this article based on "correspondence" instead of using references from the public domain.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are absolutely correct. Please see OTRS. The onus is on you to specify where I have deviated from the sources. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)