Talk:Guy Black, Baron Black of Brentwood

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to Guy Black, Lord Black of Brentwood per convent for this kind of bio. RA (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Guy Black → The Lord Black of Brentwood — Title has changed following his recent elevation to the House of Lords. 86.162.233.86 (talk) 14:34, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Oppose that one, support Guy Black, Baron Black of Brentwood - we have a very clear convention here, see eg Category:Conservative Party life peers. Johnbod (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
I don't think there is need for much discussion. I'm inclined to boldly move it to Guy Black, Lord Black of Brentwood (per convention) but since we've only one day left in this RM I'll leave it until the 7 days are done. --RA (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article in the news
"Mystery of the Wikifixer: who is the secret image-cleansing agent?", The Telegraph, 10 June 2011. Someone is astroturfing a series of Wikipedia articles on high profile wealthy Brits. Green Cardamom (talk) 05:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Guy Black, Baron Black of Brentwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120730120829/http://www.bjr.org.uk/data/2003/no1_riddell to http://www.bjr.org.uk/data/2003/no1_riddell
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008122501/http://www.asbof.co.uk/operation.htm to http://www.asbof.co.uk/operation.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100504170101/http://www.cpu.org.uk/page-view.php?pagename=WhosWho to http://www.cpu.org.uk/page-view.php?pagename=WhosWho

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

COI
Just a note of apology. I see that I edited this article quite considerably in 2012 and have made a few desultory edits since. I knew about COI then and should have declared it, as I did at articles such as Mark E. Smith and Michael Axworthy. I honestly thought that I had but I can see no record of it here, so perhaps it was mentioned elsewhere. I've known Guy since 1982 and last heard from him around Christmas 2018.

Someone might want to review my past edits here, although I doubt there will be anything untoward. Sorry. - Sitush (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)