Talk:Guy Nason

The text on the book was essentially the publisher's blurb. Having a section on it altogether seemed excessive; it is not the norm in wikipedia pages on academics unless the book is extraordinary for some reason.

Other than that - the division into sections seemed a little heavy for a page of this length, and the text needed to be reorganized a little as well. Without any negative implication on the subject's merits - judging from the dates, this is probably a page that was created (from within the university?) when he was about to become head of the department (or was being considered for the position). 80.222.42.110 (talk) 07:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guy Nason. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317045440/http://www.rss.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=479 to http://www.rss.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=479

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)