Talk:Gwion Gwion rock paintings/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs) 09:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions per 1a completed and 6a image is deleted. Wayne (talk) 05:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Redtigerxyz Talk 10:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Wayne, Dating: Remove the reference styles (Watchman 1997: 42) for reference consistency; you can include the same in the footnotes

Done Wayne (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Re Climate section. The overall climate since the LGM is relevant for who made the images because of much of Australia being uninhabitable for long periods, the reduction in population and existence of refuges. The Research section only covers the climate in regards to the end of the tradition. I agree it is unclear atm as it needs a better image to supplement the text for the general public. I'm currently doing an image in photoshop to cover this. I'm hoping the image will work to avoid the section being unnecessary detail. Wayne (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Wayne, It is not the image, but the content. Research explicitly relates the climate part with the art: "The discontinuity in artistic styles between the earlier Bradshaws and the current Wandjina has been attributed to a severe drought phase..." There is no such connection in the "Climate" section. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 04:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry I took so long to get back on this. I will incorporate the climate section with research and cut the length down substantially while adding how it is tied to research. Some researchers hold that there were several waves of immigrants during the late ice age, one arriving via New Guinea while the people who painted the Bradshaws arrived via the Kimberlys. The existence of the refuges and climate dating is used to "support" that they may not have been the ancestors of Aborigines. Because this is a controversial view it needs to be written carefully. Wayne (talk) 15:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Wayne, any updates on this? Redtigerxyz  Talk 05:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Closing note: Because the nominator has been inactive in a month, I'll close the review as failed. It has been opened for nearly three months, which was more than enough time to fix the notes.--Retrohead (talk) 10:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)