Talk:HD 110082 b

Proposed merge of HD 110082 b with List of exoplanets discovered in 2021
It's just another exoplanet, and there's probably nothing notable about it. The source does not show notability. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 21:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose The original source is secondary, therefore together with primary ref i provided the notability criteria are meet. Please also note what moving and deleting pages you did not create is likely to suffer from knowledge bias.Trurle (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You have a point, but what's special about it? 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 00:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * "Special" is a definition subject to knowledge bias, therefore classifying anything as "special" or "ordinary" (especially without consulting author of content) will likely violate Neutral point of view which is (unlike notability) is one of policy pillars of wikipedia.Trurle (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That's not what I mean. I mean, what features does it have? 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 15:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

The only unique features about the planet is that it’s larger than most sub-Neptunes, and is located in a new association. Other than that, it’s just another exoplanet. 400Weir (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)