Talk:HD 205739 b/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk • contribs • count ) 18:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll give the article a read through now and raise any points below. Outside of the GA process I'd recommend using webcite to save your references as there is only two of them and if one went down then it'd affect the article greatly. Miyagawa  (talk)  18:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I've had a read through, and there isn't many issues - in fact there's just one and it's relatively minor. The line in the lead about the surface temperature needs to be repeated in the Characteristics section. Once that's done, I'm happy to pass this as a GA. Miyagawa   (talk)  18:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I've fixed that one little tidbit, and will try to use Webcite to archive the links. Perhaps later, though, when I'm not on the way out the door. :P I didn't even know that website existed until you told me!
 * In any case, thank you for the review. I appreciate it. --Starstriker7(Talk) 14:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Nice job, article all checks out and meets the criteria. I'm a big fan of the webcite service - takes the worry out of the equation when you're writing an article that there are only a couple of citations available for! :) Miyagawa   (talk)  20:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)