Talk:HD 40307 c/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article as well, and should have the full review up in a little bit. Dana boomer (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The first reference (SIMBAD) should be formatted with a cite template the way the rest of the references are.
 * The end of the first paragraph of the Characteristics section needs a ref.
 * I adapted this from the 55 Cancri planets, which did not come with references concerning that particular point. I'll conduct a search for information. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There are no clear ways to cite that particular iota of information, as I cannot find a source in either paper or on the Internet that I can access. What's your suggested course of action? --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Icalanise found a solution to the problem. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Just a couple of reference issues (the same ones as in the last article!), so I'm putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 22:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good with the article, so I'm passing it to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)