Talk:HD 40307 d/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Guess I'll do a clean sweep of your articles! I should have the full review up soon...


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the Discovery section, you say "which functions through the by measuring". I think this needs to be tweaked a bit...
 * ✅ Fixed --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * As with the other two articles, the SIMBAD ref needs to be formatted, and the end of the first paragraph of the Characteristics section needs a ref.
 * Like with the others, I will work towards finding a reference. The Internet isn't proving very cooperative thus far. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And maybe it will never be this cooperative unless one of these planets hurls it's way into the Solar System in our lifetimes. Nutshell? I can't find anything...Should I just remove the information? --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem has been resolved by Icalanise. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A couple of reference things and one prose tweak, so I'm putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)