Talk:HD 69830 d

Incorrect Planetbox usage
The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:

This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet. Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications. ''' Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided. ''' Examples of acceptable images include * direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available; * output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b; * user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.

My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by User:MarioProtIV.

A useful radius comparison to Earth in the relevant section of the article was also removed.

I'm opening discussion as to why ...

--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I would like if the discussion was held here, rather then on all of the other pages. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 11:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

However, such moons do not usually form around planets, they would likely have to be captured from afar; e.g., a protoplanet running astray.
I suggest this line be removed from extrasolar planet articles. I've so far seen it here and the article about Kepler-90h. The same person must have put it on different articles about jovian planets in the habitable zone. The claim conflicts with everything I know about planetary science. All of the spherical moons of the solar system, with the exception of Triton, are thought to have formed alongside their host planets in a circum-lunar disk. 146.168.31.85 (talk) 09:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)