Talk:HFB 320 Hansa Jet

Untitled section
"As of 2006[update], it remains the only civilian aircraft ever to use a forward-swept wing."

According to this, it is not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.72.25 (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Plan view needed
A plan view, picture or diagram, is needed. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamburger Flugzeugbau HFB 320 Hansa Jet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326002351/http://www.hansajet.de/indexeng.htm to http://www.hansajet.de/indexeng.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

The aircraft's most defining feature are the forward-swept wings
None of the photos makes this feature visible. Surely a photo exists that better shows the wing design? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.29.228 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Only one on the Commons shows the wing sweep clearly, which I have now added. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Citation style
The citation style of this article has been changed recently without discussion. This really ought to have gone to talk page, as per WP:BRD, and reasoned out here with agreement, rather than been edit-warred into place. The style used on the article had been in place for roughly a decade, and I don't think it is clear which option to go for when bringing it into conformance, but whichever option it should be, discussion should be engaged in on this talk page if it has become contentious. Kyteto (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)


 * WP:CITEVAR considers helpful imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit. There was no consistent style before merging them: 16 citations + 4 Bibliography (and only 3 used). I choose to harmonize the ref style to the style most used for the article.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)