Talk:HHCL/Archives/2012

Comment
the copyright of the writing from pattern recognition has been granted (actually on the website, Jon mentions how he intended this to be the basis of the hhcl wikipedia entry

We're in the process of getting together substantiation for the existence of this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrellberry (talk • contribs) 12:19, 15 June 2007

Please place sign your comments with four tildes. This article sounds very promotional and if it is being written by persons associated with the firm then it brings up conflict of interest issues. At the moment it appears to have elements of a press release. Danielarrow 16:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

There may be some notability there but it is pretty obviously written by someone associated with the firm. I would at least remove any "we" or "our" first person language. I would also make the "Innovations" section more formal. At the moment it is very brochure-like and not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Independant references and sources for the assertions are needed. There are too many opinions. Danielarrow 16:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

All good advice. I'm going to pull the bulk of the content, edit tone of voice and dig out substantiation for all the main points. As for notability, see for example the Financial Times article at http://specials.ft.com/creativebusiness/jan082002/FT3N7DD96WC.html ("probably the outstanding agency of the past decade"), or the overview/interview from Bell College: http://floti.bell.ac.uk/Advertising/dont_hire_them.htm.

Darrellberry 17:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Added more substantiation to main page and removed bulk of content or rewrite Darrellberry 17:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Another good addition would be if any case studies had been written about the mentioned innovations. Danielarrow 18:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to get such things together -- going to be a busy weekend ;-) Darrellberry 18:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

hi -- we need to get the capitalisation corrct on the title of this page Darrellberry 17:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Marketing at a point of cha.jpg
Image:Marketing at a point of cha.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)