Talk:HIStory (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I was concerned about the length, but it seems this article covers all the major aspects, and after taking I look around, I too couldn't find any other sources. Here are a few minor things, but otherwise it seems to be in good shape...

Production, music and commentary:
 * We have this earlier in the article, "...It is a bit unsettling, particularly when Jackson spits out this line: 'Who gave you the right to share my family tree?'". and then this later... "Tom Sinclair of Entertainment Weekly, highlighted the lyrics "who gave you the right to share my family tree?", speculating that "armchair psychologists will have a field day with the words"." In order to avoid repeating this lyric twice, can we move the second reference up to immediately follow the first. So it could be something like, "...It is a bit unsettling, particularly when Jackson spits out this line: 'Who gave you the right to share my family tree?' Tom Sinclair of Entertainment Weekly also highlighted that lyric in particular, speculating that "armchair psychologists will have a field day with the words".

Music video:
 * "...who deliberately looks very similar to Tom Sneddon..." Anybody who clicks the wikilink will be able to see who Sneddon is, but could you just add a brief bit of context? Something like "...looks very similar to Tom Sneddon, the district attorney who prosecuted Jackson's case..." or something like that?

Will fix later tonight. Long day ahead. :) — R  2  10:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * All done. — R  2  18:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Prose is fine, MOS is fine.
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are fine, no original research.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Addresses main topics, no unneeded detail.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

That's a pass. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 01:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)