Talk:HITRUST

Lead
The lead lacks a definition of what HITRUST is. This needs to be fixed. Jodayagi (talk) 01:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Confusingly, the company has decided they are no longer "Health Information Trust Alliance", but now simply HITRUST. And the "Common Security Framework" is now just CSF. --Elephanthunter (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * the for-profit HITRUST wants to make more money. Therefore, they want to expand outside of Group Health.
 * To me, the BigFive Health Insurance Organizations got duped into HITRUST by a handful of BigFour Public Accounting Partners into creating an entire program to address security. A considerate and non-greedy public accounting partner would have simply recommended to require both an ISO/IEC27001 certification and an SSAE18 SOC2 Type 2 Assurance covering Security and Confidentiality.  Both of these measures would be easier to implement and gain a much speedier adoption, standardization of security management, and overall increase in efficacy. 70.95.82.163 (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

This meets notability guidelines
I just want to add my voice to allowing this and similar articles to survive any "notability guidelines" purges. A colleague of mine mentioned "Hitrust" to me, I didn't know what it was, and so I looked it up here in Wikipedia. By reading this page here I get a relatively neutral summary of what it is and I can follow some links on this page to know more.

If you let the notability police delete this article, you do a dis-service to Wikipedia. Having this page here has a very small marginal cost. Having a place to put any relevant information about this topic has a very high value to people like me when we need that information.

So I vote strongly in favor of keeping this and similar pages. And I encourage Wikipedia to relax it's notability requirements as the result is almost entirely positive for information consumers like myself. ZoneAlarm5 (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * There have been several edits to this article to include promotional material. Also, the main article is missing any reliable sources that would suggest notability. I do believe HITRUST may be notable, but it's not enough to add your personal anecdote. The article needs someone (not affiliated with HITRUST) to do research and add reliable sources to back that up. --Elephanthunter (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)