Talk:HIV/GA2

GA Reassessment
'''This reassessment was terminated by me because it is not consistent with the intention of WP:GAR and did not follow appropriate procedures. This discussion is preserved only as a record of the actions that were taken'''. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC) :''This discussion is transcluded from Talk:HIV/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Please see Talk:HIV which, I think, is a major issue.  Phoenix of9  06:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Also looking at HIV, there seems to be strong heterosexism. Eg: Parts about circumcision ignore information such as this:  Phoenix  of9  06:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * No problems with the table. Correctly cited with numbers that may be old, but are still best estimates. Heterosexism is your POV. That section is also written and cited correctly. --Bob (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've waited a few days but noone addressed my concerns. Bob, not only the numbers are old, but they are also contradicted by newer research.  Phoenix of9  00:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Phoenix, as an uninvolved editor, but with a lot of experience at GA, this does not look like an appropriate course of action. Please see Good article reassessment - it does not look like you have acted consistent with this process. Do not delist. This should either be a community GAR or a talk page issue (where I see the issues are being discussed). If you delist, I will immediately commence a process to reverse that action. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I now see Phoenix has attempted to close this as a delist. These actions will be reverted. Phoenix, if you have an issue, discuss it at WP:GAR or on the project's talk page, where I have left a notice. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)