Talk:HMGA1

Copyright cleanup
Content added by has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. The individual is at this writing indefinitely blocked from contributing because of this issue, and content is being removed in accordance with Copyright violation. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Copy-paste and Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I wanted to add in addition to the form letter here that in this case the content was definitely a violation of our copyright policies. What the contributed was an abridgment of a copyright source. Wrapping it in quotation marks is better than his usual practice, but does not make it usable - we must use brief quotations in transformative ways in Wikipedia's articles in accordance with WP:NFC, which explains some of the acceptable reasons to use quotations. Superseding the original by extracting the heart of it is not a usable approach. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)