Talk:HMS Argus (I49)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 23:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * No disambiguarion links
 * External links check ok
 * Reference books there is Cheltenham, England for McCart and Tonbridge, Kent, UK for Sturtivant - for consistency they should be the same . I would suggest Cheltenham, UK and  Tonbridge, UK leaving the county Kent out.
 * Agreed.
 * The book Ships of the Royal Navy has both an ISBN ans a OCLC listed all the other just have an ISBN
 * That's a template that I'm reluctant to alter.
 * In the Second World War section the paragraph starting Force H was recalled to the UK there are two red link operations Spotter and Picket- should they be linkd to Operation Spotter 1 and Operation Picket 1. It had to tell if its a 1 or an I?
 * It's a roman I and I figured to put both Spotter I and II in the same article as the second one was a repeat caused by the failure of the first.
 * There is also the mixture of styles. In the lead World War I & II and as above Second World War for the section heading. Also World War I is used in the Design, description and construction section.
 * Fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok finished review, a good article on a good ship, with some minor nit-picking points, well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * GA passed Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)