Talk:HMS Audacious (1869)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed:

Technical review

 * Citations: - the citation check tool reveals a number of errors ("Parkes, pp. 151, 155" and "p11" both "Multiple references contain the same content")
 * Citations all look good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Done now. Anotherclown (talk) 05:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Disambiguations: one dab link (to Chatham) -
 * Linkrot: Ext links all work - (no action required)
 * Alt text: All images lack alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway so its up to you if you want to add it or not) - (no action required)

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I think you may be missing a comma in this sentence: "She relieved her sister Iron Duke in Singapore and later collided with a merchant ship during a typhoon in Yokohama." I'm no expert on such matters but maybe try: "She relieved her sister Iron Duke in Singapore, and later collided with a merchant ship during a typhoon in Yokohama."
 * This sentence seems a little long and complicated to me: "In April 1904 she was renamed Fisgard (after the French translation of the Welsh town Fishguard), and until she was towed to Scapa Flow in 1914 after the start of the First World War to be used as a receiving ship and renamed Imperieuse." I'm not entirely sure by what you mean with "and until she was towed". Maybe reword?
 * Agree on both issues. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * IMO this article easily meets the GA criteria, just a couple of minor technical issues to fix up first (please see above). Anotherclown (talk) 12:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Striking all issues and passing. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 05:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)