Talk:HMS Aurora (1887)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Very little to pick on, a very sound entry ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "Aurora participate in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee Fleet review" -participated.
 * Good catch.
 * What is the source for all that infobox data?
 * Everything in the infobox is sourced in the main body. Or at least it's supposed to be; if not let me know.
 * Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Sound job.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)