Talk:HMS Blanche (H47)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Some items in the inf box need cotes
 * Motto Dum spiro spero ("While I breathe I hope")
 * Badge On a Field White, a lion rampant holding a sword and wreath all Proper.


 * Both deleted.
 * She was bombed and missed - reword as bombed sounds as if she was hit
 * Cites 2 and 3 can be combined using refname
 * Done.
 * Colledge, J. J.; Warlow, Ben has both an ISBN and an OCLC number while the others only have a ISBN or a OCLC
 * Colledge is a template that I'm not going to alter.
 * Friedman, Norman (2009) is listed as a reference but not used
 * Isn't that the one that you told me combine the references for?
 * Doh its the time of night here


 * Lenton, H. T. (1998) is listed as a reference but not used
 * Rohwer, Jürgen (2005) is listed as a reference but not used
 * Moved to further reading.

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

On hold
Some small points, I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)