Talk:HMS Bulldog (H91)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 05:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

GA criteria
: I made a few grammatical modifications, but nothing significant. With that done and dusted, the article adheres to the policies on prose, structure and layout. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article is well-referenced with reliable published sources, and doesn't look to contain any original research. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all aspects of the topic that should be covered, and does not give unnecessarily excessive detail on anything. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article exhibits no signs of bias towards or against its subject. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC) . The most recent edits listed in the revision history trail all the way back to 2011, and give no indication that any edit warring has taken place in all that time, so I think the matter of stability is not a hinderance in this case. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 05:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC) : Both images used in the article are validly licensed and serve a relevant illustrative and informative purpose. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading through the article and checking every nook and cranny, I believe it is ready to hold GA status. Congratulations! :) Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)